A bench of Justices A M Khanwilkar and D Y Chandrachud granted ad-interim stay on the direction of the high court and issued notice on the appeal filed by State Bank of India.
"There shall be ad-interim stay insofar as directions contained in sub-clause (i) of (a) of the operative part of the impugned judgment" which said that for proper functioning of ATMs, there should be security protocols including placing of guards round-the-clock at all such counters so that proper queues are enforced and only one customer could enter it at a time, it said.
The high court in its December 12, 2013 order on a petition converted into PIL after it took suo moto cognisance of media reports that a BSNL official was duped for Rs 35,000 at an ATM counter.
It had passed slew of directions like 24 hours security cover at ATMs to ensure that only one customer could enter a booth at a time, functional CCTV cameras at the counters.
It had also said that people should enter ATMs booths without mufflers, helmets or caps and sought checking of character antecedents of temporary workers.