A bench comprising Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice N V Ramana sought reply from an agriculturist from Tamil Nadu on an appeal by the former judge who sought the stay of the high court notice to him on the issue.
The high court had issued notice to Justice Radhakrishnan on the petition filed by 62-year-old agriculturist, who had alleged that the former Supreme Court judge had committed constitutional impropriety by receiving PETA's 'Man of the Year' award in 2015.
The petition in the Madurai bench of the Madras high court was filed when the pro-jallikattu agitation in Tamil Nadu was at its height.
The petitioner has alleged that since a bench headed by Justice Radhakrishnan had banned use of bulls in Jallikattu in May 2014 on petitions by Animal Welfare Board of India, People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and others, he had committed constitutional impropriety by receiving PETA's 'Man of the Year' award in 2015.
More From This Section
The agriculturist, Salai Chakrapani, had alleged that by receiving the award for a judgment, the ex-judge had violated the constitutional provision which bars judges from receiving any favour from anyone for any judgment.
Justice Radhakrishnan, in his petition, contented that under Section 3 of Judges Protection Act, 1985, "No court shall entertain or continue any civil or criminal proceeding against any person who is or was a judge for any act, thing or word committed, done or spoken by him when, or in the course of, acting or purporting to act in the discharge of his official or judicial duty or function."
The former judge has submitted that he was felicitated as 'Man of the Year' at a function organised by PETA on February 7, 2015, nearly nine months after he had retired from the apex court.