The bench also directed "that wherever a Chief Information Commissioner is of the opinion that intricate questions of law have to be decided in a matter..., he will ensure the matter is heard by a bench of which at least one member has knowledge and experience in the field of law."
A bench of justices A K Patnaik and A K Sikri, however, made it clear that during pendency of the pleas challenging its judgement, authorities can continue to fill up the vacant positions in information commissions in accordance with the Right to Information (RTI) Act and its verdict, except the portion which has been stayed.
"We make it clear that subject to orders that may be finally passed after hearing the review petitions, the competent authority will continue to fill up the vacant posts of information commissioners in accordance with the Act and in accordance with the judgement ... Except sub-paras which we have stayed.
"This is to ensure that functioning of the information commissioners in accordance with the Act and the judgement is not affected during the pendency of the review petitions," it said.
The bench also clarified in its order that "the chief commissioners already functioning will continue to function until the disposal of the review petitions".