The matter will be heard by a bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam.
In his petition, Swamy has said the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act (JJA) provides for a "straitjacket" interpretation of term juvenile that a person below the age of 18 years is a minor and it was in violation of the United Nations Convention for the Rights of the Child (UNCRC) and Beijing Rules on the issue.
A provision of the JJA says "'juvenile' or 'child' means a person who has not completed eighteenth year of age."
"I submit, that since it was the intention of Parliament, as stated in the Preamble, to enact JJA in consonance with the ratified UNCRC and Beijing Rules it is prayed that this Court after hearing the UOI if necessary, may read the words 'mental and intellectual maturity' into the wording of Section 2(k) on the age of innocence," he said.
The present interpretation of term juvenile has the effect of "nullifying" the fundamental right to life of the victim, he contended.