Restraining media from publishing "anything that will relate to identity of the lady", the bench of justices Dipak Misra and Amitava Roy expunged the "scandalous" contentions raised by Sabu Stephen, who had filed the PIL on the issue of culling of stray dogs, against a person in his interim plea.
"While we do not entertain this application, we caution and warn the petitioner to conduct himself appropriately and restrain from making any slightest effort to file such applications before this court or any court relating to this incident," the bench said.
It also said that it seemed Stephen has thrown the "initial decorum that allowed him to address the court to the winds".
Restraining all who possessed the copy of the plea from further circulating and using, the bench said it was also discernible that the allegations made were "scandalous, unwarranted, indecent and absolutely uncalled for".
The court had a word of caution for the non-lawyer petitioner who was allowed to take up the public cause.
"When the petitioner's public interest litigation was entertained and he was permitted to argue in person, he should have understood that this court had appreciated his concern, but by filing the present interlocutory application, it seems that he has thrown the initial decorum that allowed him to address the court to the winds," it said.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content