The work marks a significant advance in the field - one that dramatically shortens the time it takes computers to 'learn' new concepts and broadens their application to more creative tasks.
"Our results show that by reverse engineering how people think about a problem, we can develop better algorithms," said Brenden Lake from New York University.
"Moreover, this work points to promising methods to narrow the gap for other machine learning tasks," said Lake.
While machines can now replicate some pattern-recognition tasks previously done only by humans - ATMs reading the numbers written on a check, for instance - machines typically need to be given hundreds or thousands of examples to perform with similar accuracy.
More From This Section
"It has been very difficult to build machines that require as little data as humans when learning a new concept," said Ruslan Salakhutdinov from the University of Toronto.
The researchers developed a 'Bayesian Programme Learning' (BPL) framework, where concepts are represented as simple computer programmes.
For instance, the letter 'A' is represented by computer code - resembling the work of a computer programmer - that generates examples of that letter when the code is run.
Yet no programmer is required during the learning process: the algorithm programmes itself by constructing code to produce the letter it sees.
Also, unlike standard computer programmes that produce the same output every time they run, these probabilistic programmes produce different outputs at each execution.
While standard pattern recognition algorithms represent concepts as configurations of pixels or collections of features, the BPL approach learns "generative models" of processes in the world, making learning a matter of 'model building' or 'explaining' the data provided to the algorithm.
In the case of writing and recognising letters, BPL is designed to capture both the causal and compositional properties of real-world processes, allowing the algorithm to use data more efficiently.
The research appears in the journal Science.