According to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), the company issued redeemable preference shares worth Rs 23.18 crore to 25,231 people between 2008-09 and 2012-13.
Since these shares were issued to more than 50 investors, these qualified to be a public issue, which requires compulsory listing on recognised stock exchanges.
Among others, the firm was also required to file prospectus, which they failed to do.
In an interim order dated December 30, Sebi Whole Time Member S Raman said, "... I find that there is no other alternative but to take recourse through an interim action against HHL and its directors, for preventing that company from further carrying on with its fund mobilising activity under the offer of redeemable preference shares."
Also Read
While, Pijush Gupta, Nihar Ranjan Khuntia, Balaram Chatterjee, Asit Roy, Subodh Kumar Dutta, Pradip Sarkar, Raja Banerjee, Pradip Bose, A K Goswami and Ashok Chowdhury are the past directors who are also prohibited from the markets.
As a strong votary of transparency in corporate India,
Sinha said regulators too "cannot escape the scrutiny of their working" as they are, in several cases, empowered as "mini states" with vast power.
"It was time to pause and think whether we are creating too many institutions to ensure accountability or should we aim towards more accountability in more institutions," he added.
Sinha said whenever a large episode of misconduct is detected, a perception gets built about "regulatory capture" coming in the way of effective action.
Giving examples of outcry on ponzy schemes, the Sebi chairman said while a need was felt to further empower the regulators, it is also then incumbent on the regulators to be accountable to Parliament and public.
This is all the more true because in many cases in several countries regulators are given powers equivalent to "mini states" enjoying quasi-judicial powers along with executive powers which in many cases have Parliamentary backing by way of subordinate legislations or rules which are attached to the main laws, he added.
In the Indian context, Sinha said the Sebi has noticed and stopped instances where small insignificant private companies were being merged with the listed companies at a huge valuation primarily to provide gain to the promoters at the cost of other shareholders.
However, the Sebi chief pressed for checks and balances to ensure that in the name of accountability the very functioning of the regulators is not throttled.
Besides, the regulator follows a policy of consultation before it undertakes any fresh regulation or changes any existing legislation.
He also said that corporate governance is also getting more attention. Audit committee, related party transaction, and independent director are some of the areas where accountability of corporations are being tested vigorously.
Sinha also touched upon the issue of gender sensitivity among Indian firms which still do not measure up to the global standards despite improvement in the last five years.
When asked about the time frame for cutting down the time for listing of companies on stock exchanges to four days from six days, Sinha said that Sebi cannot give any time frame in this regard.
Earlier this week, Sebi said it is working towards cutting down the time taken for listing of companies on stock exchanges to four days.
Regarding dividend distribution policy, Sinha said the regulator has already asked top 500 listed companies to formulate a 'dividend distribution policy'.