The new norms can have a significant impact on the way some merger and acquisition deals are structured, as also in cases involving corporate restructuring that take place due to disputes among members of business families or after settlements between rival corporates.
Some of the scenarios where such reclassification has already been sought by promoters include cases of split in a promoter family, a main promoter selling majority stake to another investor, marriage between members of rival business families and a promoter group wanting to exit from day-to-day operations of a listed company.
Post reclassification, no shareholding agreement shall exist and all past agreements should be made null and void, Sebi said in its draft paper, adding "...Such outgoing entities shall have only such rights as any other public shareholder".
At present, the regulatory framework does not prescribe any specific criteria for such re-classification, which Sebi feels is required to lend objectivity to the process of reclassification of promoters of listed companies as public shareholders under various circumstances.
Also Read
According to the proposed rules, under three scenarios a promoter or promoter group can be re-classified as a public shareholder
These scenarios are-- pursuant to an open offer, in case of a separation agreement, where terms of the separation agreement should be disclosed to the stock exchanges, prior to the reclassification and in case the promoter group holds less than five per cent shares in the company (including any convertibles/outstanding warrants/ADR/GDR Holding).
After reclassification, the outgoing entities would not hold any key management position in the company and other group firms. They would not exercise, directly or indirectly, any control over the affairs of the company or any of the group firm. However, they should not be debarred from accessing the capital market.