As many as ten entities were found to have indulged in synchronised trading with respect to shares of Nakoda Textiles India, Gayatri Projects, Nandan Exim and Trimurthi Drugs and Pharmaceuticals.
The 10 entities -- Dhirajbhai V Sanghvi HUF, Rameshbhai Vanghjibhai Shah, Vishnu Enterprise, Sagar Sanghvi, Ashik Sanghvi, Sajjankumar Nanwal, Sunitadevi Nanwal, Govindkumar Varma, Babubhai Desai and Sanghvi Fincap -- have been slapped with a total fine of Rs 2,57,60,000.
Synchronised trading refers to a practice where the seller and buyer may have an understanding between them on trading of specific shares.
The fresh ruling comes after the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) set aside an earlier order of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) and asked the regulator to look into the matter afresh.
Also Read
Sebi had carried out a probe into the trading activity of the 10 entities in the shares of the firms for the period from July 2009 to January 2010 and it was revealed that the entities, who had traded significantly in the scrips of the firms, were connected to each other.
The regulator said that by indulging in the manipulative trades, the entities not only created artificial volumes in the four scrips but also gave a misleading appearance of trading in the scrips.
"The 10 noticees (entities), being related / connected with one another, had traded in the said four scrips in a manipulative manner i.E. Synchronised trading and thereby, have violated the provisions of... PFUTP (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices relating to Securities Market) Regulations," Sebi said.
Sebi said that Dhirajlal V Sanghvi HUF, Ashik D Sanghvi, Vishu Enterprise and Rameshbhai Vanghjibhai Shah, by indulging in manipulative trades such as self trades, have created artificial volumes in the four scrips, thereby, violating PFUTP Regulations.
According to the Sebi order, Rameshbhai Vanghjibhai Shah, Dhirajlal V Sanghvi HUF and Vishu Enterprise by putting in buy orders at rates higher than the last traded price (LTP) for intraday trades and higher than previous close price for first trades, had influenced the price of the four scrips.
The regulator said that MTL, by executing manipulative trades in the four scrips on behalf of its client, has shown "lack of due care and caution" and violated provisions of the Broker Regulations.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content