The committee asked him to explain why he should not be charged for contempt of the House by abetting R Chandrasekaran to function as Commissioner of Puducherry Municipality violating the ruling of the Speaker on the floor of the House on March 30.
The summons stated that theSpeaker had in a note to the Committee on April 3 for perusal and to decide the contempt of the House.
He was summoned by the Committee in the wake of a complaint filed before the Committee by an opposition MLA and few others.
Chandrasekaran resumed office of the Commissioner of Puducherry Municipality yesterday though he was placed under compulsory wait after he was replaced by a ruling of the Speaker.
Also Read
The committee had served him the summons on the ground that he had committed contempt of the House by resuming office against the ruling of the Speaker.
Parliamentary Secretary to the Chief Minister K Lakshminarayanan who is one of the members of the Privilege Committee told newsmen at the end of nearly thirty minute proceedings, Chandrasekaran was handed copies of complaints the committee had received.
Chandrasekaran was given time till April 11 to submit his replies.
While keeping him under compulsory wait the Chief Secretary in his order had assigned the post of Municipal Commissioner to Director of Art and Culture.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content