The government should notify the said officer without any delay, Justice S Nagamuthu said.
He gave the direction on a petition by one R Pandian, an Assistant Engineer charged with receiving Rs 1,000 as bribe, who sought quashing of proceedings in the trial court, saying his case had been dragging on for 14 years and denial of speedy trial was denial of fundemental right.
The report also said that the post of Deputy Legal Advisors who handled anti-corruption cases was vacant in many courts and only seven DLAs were managing 26 courts.
DVAC had sent a proposal to government, seeking creation of 17 additional DLA posts and 3 Additional Legal Advisors (ALAs) posts, it said.
Also Read
Meanwhile the Additional Advocate General submitted that the DVAC proposal for appointment of DLAs and ALAs was under the consideration of the Government.
The Judge relating to this case said there was delay in notifying the CJM and special judge,and this was one of the causes of delay in the case filed by pudukottai DSP of DVAC.
To avoid such delays the HC Registry should send the roposals immediately on posting of an officer in a particular court, on receipt of which, government should immediately notify the officer under Prevention of Corruption Act.
He said there was delay on the part of the petitioner also who filed discharge petition and also appealed against the dismissal of the same.
The charge against the petitioner was serious and hence he was not inclined to quash it, the judge said.
He said government should expedite the trial and all witnesses should be produced in six weeks and examined.