"The petitioner is saying the heart of the movie, which is the trailer, is the complete adaptation of his literary work. Just have a meeting with him (writer) and see whether something can be done or not. Be truthful," a bench of Acting Chief Justice B D Ahmed and Justice Siddharth Mridul said.
Senior advocate Pratibha Maninder Singh, appearing for Sushant Supriya, Hindi short story writer and poet, referred to nine expressions from the trailer of the movie, which is scheduled to hit theatres across the country on April 11 and said they have been copied from short story 'Bhootnath' of the writer published in 2007 in Hindi magazine 'Aaj Kal'.
"Then what do you want?," the bench asked.
"I want the credit," the lawyer said and referred to the reviews of 2008 flick Bhoothnath, which also had Amitabh in lead role, in support of her submission.
More From This Section
"It is notable even the first Bhootnath film was a copy of the 'The Canterville Ghost', a short story by Oscar Wilde.
"The defendants have never made an original film on the theme of a friendly ghost, and have not done so in the case of the infringing film as well...," the petition said.
"Unlike most sequels, the infringing film is based on an entirely new storyline from the first Bhootnath film, and has no relationship with the first film, especially in terms of the supporting cast.
"Even the central character of the infringing film has no relationship with the central character of the first Bhootnath film. This demonstrates that the infringing film has appropriated the Plaintiffs original literary work," the petition said.