"The UP government's decision to erect a statue of Lord Ram is commendable. In keeping with the 'Ganga-Jamuni tehzeeb' of Awadh, these silver arrows will be just a token of admiration and esteem in which the Shias hold Lord Ram," the board's chairman Waseem Rizvi said in a letter to Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath.
The construction of the statue would put UP on the world map, he said.
Both leaders termed the move as "illegal and unconstitutional", saying that in a secular country, a government cannot involve or associate itself with a project like this (building the statue of a deity).
"The Nawabs of this region always respected the temples in Ayodhya. So much so that the land for Hanuman Garhi in central Ayodhya was donated by Nawab Shuja-ud-Daulah in 1739, while the funds to construct the Hanuman Garhi temple were provided by Nawab Asif-ud-Daullah, between 1775 and 1793," Rizvi pointed out.
Also Read
The Shia Board is one of the parties in the appeals pending in the Supreme Court pertaining to the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case.
Rizvi had earlier filed an affidavit before the Supreme Court saying that the Shia board had no problem if the mosque was built at a reasonable distance from the 2.73-acre disputed land, preferably in a Muslim dominated locality, in Ayodhya.
The Shia Board had also claimed in an affidavit that the land, on which Babri Masjid had stood before it was demolished by a frenzied mob on December 6, 1992, belonged to it and that only it was entitled to negotiate an amicable solution with the consent of all stakeholders.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content