Sibal, who had argued before a five-judge constitution bench that triple talaq was an integral practice in Islam, told PTI that this was a "dying" and "sinful" practice and even the AIMPLB had agreed to suggest Qazis to give women the liberty to say 'no' to 'talaq-e-biddat' at the time of execution of the Nikahnama (marriage contract).
"We welcome the judgement in its entirety on the issue of practice of instantaneous divorce through triple talaq," he said.
Referring to the common points in the dissenting judgements, the astute lawyer said all the judges at the bench have agreed that personal law cannot be challenged on the grounds of infringment of fundamental rights.
"The verdict has protected the personal law that there can not be a challenge to Part III of the Constitution which has been held by Chief Justice J S Khehar and Justice S Abdul Nazeer in their minority judgement," he said.
More From This Section
Sibal said Justice Joseph had also disagreed with Justices R F Nariman and U U Lalit that the 1937 Act was not a legitimate law.
He disagreed with the perception that the judgement is a step towards achieving the goal of Uniform Civil Code which can only come through a legislation.
In a lighter vein, the Congress leader said Prime Minister Narendra Modi should also make efforts to bring a law to ensure justice for Hindu women in certain cases.
The two separate judgements, written for majority by Justices Kurian Joseph and R F Nariman, did not concur with the CJI and Justice S Abdul Nazeer that 'triple talaq' was a part of religious practice and the government should step and come out with a law.