"Having arrogated themselves the power of appointment, having made themselves the most incestuous family in the world by procreating themselves through progeny, they must now bear the responsibility of arrears," Singhvi said, speaking on the issue of backlog at a seminar at Nirma University here.
The issue can be addressed by timely appointment of judges which was not being done, with only 609 posts in High Courts filled out of the total requirement of 1,017 as of November 1, 2015, the senior lawyer said.
The country's ratio of 13.5 judges per one million people was one of the lowest in the world, Singhvi noted.
As of October 2015 there were 2.7 crore pending cases across the courts in the country, he said.
More From This Section
"Today, the apex court must take the responsibility. Because you have arrogated to yourselves the power of appointment since 1993, you can't have power and not the responsibility, you can't have power and not the accountability, excuses," he said.
The debate on memorandum of procedure (MoP) for
"The NJAC case took almost a year to decide. When the SC started to hear the NJAC case, it said it won't appoint judges while hearing the case through the collegium system. For 12 months, in a country with 1,017 HC judges, with 40 per cent vacancies, why should you stop appointing judges while hearing NJAC cases?" he said, adding this delayed the appointments by six months.
The problem of backlog was not a big one, the Congress MP said, adding that it can be addressed by "attitudinal changes". He also said that reforms in judicial administration should be taught as a subject in the law colleges.
The appointment of ad hoc judges, which could address the issue of backlog, too was marred by "ego and politics", Singhvi said.