In a first-of-its-kind randomised clinical trial, researchers found that 'normal' metabolisers of nicotine were significantly more likely to stay quit with the help of the drug varenicline compared to the nicotine patch at the end of treatment and 6-months later.
"Slow" metabolisers, on the other hand, would most likely benefit from the nicotine patch.
Varenicline (Chantix, manufactured by Pfizer) was just as effective as a nicotine patch at helping those people quit, but there were more overall side effects reported with the drug.
The difference between slow and normal metabolisers is how long nicotine stays in the body after quitting. Nicotine levels drop more quickly in normal metabolisers, putting them at risk to succumb to the cravings and relapse.
More From This Section
But they are also more likely to be helped by medications like varenicline, which can increase levels of the "feel-good" hormone dopamine in their bodies and reduce cravings.
All received behavioural counselling, as well.
Participants were blood tested within seven days of beginning treatment to assess their nicotine metabolite ratio. To distinguish between slow or normal, the researchers looked at the ratio of two metabolites derived from nicotine during smoking, 3'hydroxycotine/cotine.
That ratio reflects the activity of the liver enzyme CYP2A6, the major nicotine and cotinine-metabolising enzyme that helps people metabolise nicotine more quickly.
Researchers also followed up with participants at six and 12 months. Nearly 40 per cent of normal metabolisers on varenicline were still abstaining from smoking at the end of treatment compared to 22 per cent on the patch.
The findings indicated that varenicline was more efficacious than the nicotine patch for normal metabolisers, while the efficacy was equivalent for slow metabolisers.
However, this group reported more overall side effects, suggesting those smokers would gain more benefit from the patch.
The research is published in the journal Lancet Respiratory Medicine.