The apex court said it was extremely unfortunate that government had no provision for providing compensation to the workers and it was also regrettable that it cleared the pending wage bill for 2015-16, only during the pendency of the case and "the government of India must shape up in this regard".
"...A worker is entitled to compensation at the rate of 0.05 per cent per day for delayed payment of the wages due. We are quite pained to note that the government of India has made no provision for this compensation while releasing the wages for 2015-16 of Rs 7,983 crores.
The Centre has admitted before the apex court that the pending wage bill under MNREGA scheme till March 31, 2016 was around Rs 7,983 crores.
However, later the Centre in its affidavit has said in April that an amount Rs 11,030 crore will be released to the states within one week which will take care of the pending wage bill including Rs 2,723 crore of ten drought-affected states where additional 50 days of employment is given to households.
Also Read
The bench directed the Centre to release to the state
governments adequate funds under the scheme in a timely manner so that the 'workforce' is paid its wages well in time and observed that it is regrettable that the pending wage bill for 2015-16 was cleared only during the pendency of the case and "the government of India must shape up in this regard".
The court also noted that job cards have been issued to about 13.26 crore households all over the country and the number of active job cards is about 5.72 crores and the total households that have worked in the financial year 2015-16 is about 4.77 crores.
Regarding the National Food Security (NFS) Act, the apex court said that even though the statute was passed by Parliament and have come into force on July 5, 2013, some states have not implemented it.
The bench said that a state government, by delaying implementation of a law passed by Parliament and assented to by the President of India, is effectively refusing to implement it and Parliament is left a mute spectator.
(Reopen LGD40)
The apex court further said that it is the obligation of the Centre to comply with all the provisions of the laws enacted by Parliament and it should establish and constitute bodies and authorities provided for by law and make available the necessary finances.
"The State cannot say that it is not bound to follow the law and cannot adhere to statutory provisions enacted by Parliament and create a smokescreen of a lack of finances or some other cover-up. The rule of law binds everyone, including the State," it said.
The bench also refused to appoint Court Commissioner as demanded by petitioner NGO Swaraj Abhiyan for implementation of directions of the court saying in-house checks have already been statutorily recognized for all the issues.
It, however, did not dispose of the petition and kept it pending while seeking a status report from the Centre on the action taken on various directions. It adjourned the case for August 1.
It said that at least one-fourth of the country's population (if not 1/3rd) is affected by drought and the state governments must take appropriate steps to ensure that at least the statutory requirement of foodgrains is made available to the people in drought-affected areas of the country.
It said that states shall constitute a State Food Commission for monitoring and reviewing the implementation of NFS Act within two months.
It directed that Bihar, Haryana and Uttar Pradesh must within a month from today make adequate provision for the supply of eggs or milk or any other nutritional substitute for children under the mid-day meal scheme.