Denying allegation that he had unleashed his dog on his wife Lipika, Bharti said he was ready to have the dog examined by the Investigating Officer(IO) or an expert.
In his petition, Bharti said "it is submitted that experts say that a family dog can never be forced against one family member by another. Further, the said dog was a Labrador, and Labradors by the very nature are peaceful animals."
In his application, Bharti has claimed that invocation of section 307 (attempt to murder) of IPC in the FIR was "politically motivated" to somehow arrest him and alleged that it was done under the dictates of the central government "which is disgruntled due to the recent loss in Delhi elections and is taking revenge by targeting (AAP) leaders."
In the applications moved through advocate Vijay Aggarwal, Bharti said he has joined investigation on three occasions and also claimed that the police was prejudiced against him due to issuance of notice to Commissioner of Police in a separate matter which has "led to the malicious and vindictive conduct of the Commissioner in the case in order to frame and persecute him."
Seeking cancellation of the NBW issued against him, Bharti said it had no purpose as he was not absconding from the law.
The NBW was issued on an application moved by the Delhi Police which had contended that Bharti was not cooperating in the probe and had failed to appear for interrogation despite three summons issued to him.