In his opinion given to the Delhi government he said that there are "serious legal infirmities" in the Transaction Business Rules (TBR) of 2002 which requires approval by Central government before passage of certain types of bills.
The Delhi government had asked him whether Rule 55(1) of TBR violates the Constitution and does the Central government have the power to make that rule under section 44 of the Government of NCT of Delhi Act.
"Consequently, the said Rule is tantamount to conferring veto powers on the proposed state legislation by the Central government upon the mistaken notion that the government of Delhi is a government department working under the control and supervision of the Central Government," Sorabjee said in his opinion.
He said it was beyond his comprehension how reference to the Central government can be brought in by the said rule, which is a "piece of colourable legislation".
He also felt that section 22 of the GNCTD Act as a limited application relating only to money bills. Therefore, there is no embargo or restriction of any bill which according to well settled doctrine of pith and substance is not a money bill.
"The assembly's right to introduce a bill or a proposal cannot be curtailed or circumvented directly or indirectly by any rule," he said.