Zuma had applied to prevent the tapes from being released while the opposition Democratic Alliance party sought access to them.
Conversations on the recordings were cited as a reason to drop fraud and corruption charges against Zuma before he became president in 2009. The prosecuting authority at that time said the conversations showed there was a political conspiracy against Zuma, but the actual recordings were never made public.
"We are all equal before the law," she said in front of the court. "None of us is above the law. The court systems are being hijacked by politicians like Zuma and his network... If anybody is suspected of a crime and if there is a case to be made, that person must have his day in court, whether that person is a president or a pauper."
More From This Section
The National Prosecuting Authority's acting director Mokotedi Mpshe in 2009 said he dropped fraud and corruption charges against Zuma because of prosecutorial misconduct. That decision came after Zuma's legal team brought him taped phone conversations allegedly between prosecutors and a head of a now disbanded crime-fighting unit called the Scorpions about the charges and their timing. The charges were announced around the time of a national conference of the ruling African National Congress party in 2007, purportedly to undermine Zuma's bid to become party president.
Kwandiwe Kondlo, a political and governance analyst, says the decision helps restore confidence in legal institutions. "At least we can now believe there was independence in the courts," he said.
Zuma also faces questions about more than USD 20 million in government money spent to upgrade his private rural home. South Africa's public prosecutor had submitted a report suggesting that he pay back to the government a portion of the funds that were not spent on security upgrades. The issue has caused an exchange of words between the public prosecutor and the ANC in recent days.