She maintained that a discussion should have taken place as it was a very important bill and said opposition members, who did not participate and continued to protest, could have raised all the issues they wanted.
"It would be very good if a discussion had happened. It was a very important bill. Everybody will agree that a discussion is necessary. All the issues could have been raised which they (opposition) wanted during it. I requested for it again and again. Without discussion, bill should not have been taken up but urgency is also there," the Speaker told reporters.
"Impasse should break. Parliament is for debate," she said.
Amid a din, the bill which seeks to tax money deposited in banks post demonetisation was passed in the House within minutes without any debate.
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content
You’ve hit your limit of 5 free articles this month.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
Already subscribed? Log in
Subscribe to read the full story →
Smart Quarterly
₹900
3 Months
₹300/Month
Smart Essential
₹2,700
1 Year
₹225/Month
Super Saver
₹3,900
2 Years
₹162/Month
Renews automatically, cancel anytime
Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans
Access to Exclusive Premium Stories Online
Over 30 behind the paywall stories daily, handpicked by our editors for subscribers


Complimentary Access to The New York Times
News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic
Business Standard Epaper
Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share


Curated Newsletters
Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox
Market Analysis & Investment Insights
In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor


Archives
Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997
Ad-free Reading
Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements


Seamless Access Across All Devices
Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app