The apex court delivered its judgement to this effect after setting aside the 2013 verdict of the Gujarat High Court holding that the levy of property tax on mobile towers by state government was beyond its competence.
A Bench comprising Justices Ranjan Gogoi and P C Pant held as valid the provision of the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporations Act imposing tax on on mobile towers on the ground that they were within the fold of "land and building" as defined in the law.
List II of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution enumerates the items on which a state government can make law and Entry 49 refers to land and buildings.
The apex court said, under the Act, the incidence of the
More From This Section
tax was "not on the use of the plant and machinery in the mobile tower but on the use of the land or building, as may be, for purpose of the mobile tower".
The Gujarat high court had in 2013 declared Section 145A of the Gujarat Provincial Municipal Corporations Act ultra vires the Constitution and on that basis prohibited levying of property tax on mobile towers.
The high court, however, held that the cabin on a tower is liable to property tax.
The high court's decision was challenged by the state government and municipal authorities to the extent that it prohibited levy of property tax on mobile towers.