Delhi High Court Bar Association (DHCBA) put up notices outside each court informing the lawyers as well as litigants about the strike and names of proxy counsel.
Lawyers abstained from appearing in matters and only proxy counsel were present to get a next date for hearing in the cases listed before various benches of the High Court.
However, in some matters the court issued notice and sought replies from the respondents in the cases.
DHCBA had yesterday passed a resolution, which received support of the association's Executive Committee but not of its president, calling for "total abstention from work" on May 8 and May 11 in protest against the passage of pecuniary jurisdiction bill.
Also Read
It said that the bill was passed despite assurance given to them by Law Minister D V Sadananda Gowda that it would be taken up with the Commercial Divisions Bill and not in isolation. DHCBA strongly condemned "this abject volte-face by Union Law Minister".
The lawyers of the six district courts were on strike since April 22 over delay in tabling of the Delhi High Court (Amendment) bill, to increase pecuniary jurisdiction of the trial courts here, and have now decided to continue their protest till it is passed by the Lok Sabha.
If the bill is also passed by Lok Sabha, Delhi High Court would have jurisdiction over suits which are above the value of Rs two crore. The value earlier was Rs 20 lakh.