Justice Sudhir Agrawal observed,"The right of an accused to put his best evidence can/should not be defeated in the name of expeditious trial".
The court passed the order on Talwars' petition, challenging an order of the special CBI court at Ghaziabad which had rejected their request for placing on record call details of a couple of mobile phones and a landline, reports of narco-analysis, brain-mapping, sound simulation and other forensic tests conducted on them as well as some witnesses in the case.
It ordered that nodal officers of Vodafone and Bharti Airtel be summoned, as per the petitioners' request.
However, on the plea to order summoning of senior IPS officer Arun Kumar, at present posted as ADG (Law and Order) of Uttar Pradesh, the court said it did not "find any justification for his summoning" or "any error on part of the court below in rejecting the requests made by applicants.
More From This Section
Similarly, the request for summoning of the Registrar of Supreme Court for producing "original record" of a review petition filed by Talwars last year was described by the High Court as "patently mischievous" and having "rightly been rejected by court below".
"For that purpose, there is no justification whatsoever for directing production of original record of review petition," the court remarked.