The East District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum said that the act of TPDDL's employees is "nothing but unfair trade practice" as the notice was issued alleging that complainant had not allowed entry to the meter reader, whereas the bill raised showed that readings had been recorded.
"The notice dated February 11, 2013 says complainant refused the official of the NDPL (now TPDDL) to enter the premises. This allegation of the respondent itself is belied by their own bill which has been issued on March 8, 2013 showing billing period of January 9 to February 18.
Apart from awarding damages to the complainant, Delhi resident Akash Malhotra, the forum also directed TPDDL's General Manager to deduct the compensation amount from the salaries of the meter reader and the person who issued the notice "without verifying the factual situation" and to take suitable action against them.
Thereafter, on March 4 they received the notice dated February 11, 2013 which said their power supply would be cut for not allowing entry to meter reader to record the reading.
TDPPL in its written statement had denied the allegations.