"What we need is an Asia-Pacific treaty for convergence of important commercial laws," said Bharat Vasani, chief legal and group general counsel of Tata Sons.
"While it is well-understood that harmonisation of all the laws is an impossible dream, and to some extent is not even desirable, however, I firmly believe that convergence in the areas of corporate laws, commercial laws, competition laws and investment laws is feasible and achievable," Vasani said.
He said differences in labelling laws in Asian countries inhibit growth in international trade and commerce in food and pharmaceutical products.
"We need to have clarity on which laws need to be converged and the laws which are difficult to converge."
Also Read
Switching to larger corporate law issues, divergent provisions in national company law legislations with regard to raising of capital by way of debt or equity and merger & acquisition transactions have posed significant hurdles in cross-border investment decisions, Vasani said.
He shared Tata's experience of cross-border acquisitions in Asia, saying a major part of the time in due-diligence was spent in identifying legal and regulatory risks associated with the jurisdiction in which the target company is based.
"I have come across several instances were despite attractive commercial benefits, our group had to forego some acquisition targets due to uncertain legal regime and serious regulatory risk associated with the acquisition," said Vasani.
"In such an environment, all that can help and facilitate promotion of trade and commerce and reduce transaction costs needs to be encouraged," Vasani stressed.
"I believe it is a historic opportunity for Asian countries to seriously explore and implement legal convergence," he added.
Vasani also welcomed the ABLI in Singapore, saying its setting up is a step in the right direction for Asian businesses. ABLI was launched by chief justices and justices from Australia, China, India and Singapore.