Tear-jerking moment for us, LGBTQ activists on SC verdict

"Maybe I would have left the country" had the verdict not been favourable, said hotelier Keshav Suri, one of the petitioners against Section 377, parts of which was struck down by the Supreme Court Thursday.With the top court decriminalising consensual gay sex, Suri said, "We are ready for a change."As soon as he entered his The Lalit hotel in New Delhi after the verdict, a flash celebration broke out there. The staffers, wearing rainbow scarfs, danced to the tune of "Scream & Shout" by American recording artists will.i.am and Britney Spears.The lyrics of the songs is, "... When we up in the club All eyes on us. All eyes on us. All eyes on us."Suri married his French partner Cyril Feuillebois earlier this year in Paris. He said the verdict paves the way for full equality."It is time... The LGBTQ community should not live in shadows and not in the basement of a nightclub. We hope to have representation in Parliament and in the Supreme Court someday," he said.Feuillebois, who was accompanying Suri when the Supreme Court announced the judgment, said the verdict is the "first step for many more such things to come"."I have been in India for 15 years and I am very happy to have married Keshav," Feuillebois said.In its 493-page judgment, the Supreme Court ruled that consensual gay sex is not a crime and struck down the British-era law. It held that Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code was used as a weapon to harass members of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ) community, resulting in discrimination.LGBTQ activist Mohnish Malhotra said hearing the verdict was a "tear-jerking moment for us"."Our identities were called sacred. We were told we will look at every cloud with a rainbow. Such things bring validation to everything we have gone through all these years - the stigma and the abuse," said Malhotra.He said the law will not be used for harassment of the community now and the historic verdict paves the way for an inclusive India."The legal journey has been a long and tedious one. We went to the court multiple times. It was goosebump moment when Justice Indu Malhotra apologised to the community," he said.In delivering four separate but concurring judgements, the top court set aside its 2013 verdict which had re-criminalised consensual unnatural sex.Neeha Nagpal, Suri's lawyer, said each of the four judgements is a profound one."Today has been a historic unanimous judgement. It was a one-hour pronouncement, something which has never happened before. There was a bench of five judges and four verdicts and each one of them agreed with the other. Each judgement is so profound," she said.Be it Justice Indu Malhotra's impactful apology or Justice Nariman asking for sensitisation of police and public, which has laid the path for India, it is difficult to say what was more profound than the other, Nagpal said.Ishaan Sethi, creator of Delta app for connecting members of the LGBT community, said there were "multiple goosebump moments" during the verdict."It was beautiful to see the emotions. There were multiple goosebump moments and the acknowledgement is a huge step forward," Sethi said.The activists also said Justice Indu Malhotra's apology was reminiscent of British Prime Minister Theresa May's apology.Suri said his company has inclusive policies for the community and they have worked with 35 drag queens and 35 trans-queens."There is no law that stops corporates from running inclusive and diverse programmes and now there will be a change," he said.In reply to a query about his future course of action in case the verdict had not been in favour of the community, Suri said, "Maybe I would have left the country. It has been a big issue because a massive amount of braindrain has happened with members of the LGBTQ community moving abroad due to the colonial and draconian law."He expressed the hope that conversation will have a trickle effect in every walk of life."There are places like Israel, France and the US which allow LGBTQ tourism. The Indian economy lost anywhere between 0.1 and 1.7 per cent of its GDP because of the law. This conversation is going to have a trickle affect in every walk of the life."The world is watching. Now the judge has turned around and told the media to make sure this goes viral," he said.

Tear-jerking moment for us, LGBTQ activists on SC verdict

Also Read

SC to hear petition against Section 377 today

SC to hear petition against Section 377 next week

If enacted, Section 377 'won't withstand the test of constitutionality'

Section 377: Centre to file response in SC today

SC refuses to expand scope of challenge to IPC Section 377 IPC

Explore News