The apex court, which removed Thakur as BCCI president and secretary Ajay Shirke directing them to "forthwith cease and desist from" the board's work, said that by seeking a letter from ICC in August 2016 that the appointment of a nominee of CAG would amount to "governmental interference", was an attempt by head of BCCI to evade complying with the order of this court.
It said that there was "no occasion" for Thakur to solicit a letter from chairperson of ICC at the ICC Governance Review Committee Meeting held at Dubai on August 6 and 7, 2016 and this act intended to "thwart implementation of the orders of the court".
The apex court said that an attempt was made by Thakur to
build up a record to show that implementing the orders of the Supreme Court would run the risk of endangering the status of BCCI as a member of ICC.
More From This Section
"We accordingly have arrived at the conclusion that Thakur has by his actions and conduct rendered himself unfit for continuance as President of BCCI, for the following reasons: Firstly, he has obstructed and impeded the implementation of the directions contained in the judgment and order of this court dated July 18 2016. His own version is that he has been 'rendered totally incapable and without any authority' to compel the members to comply with the orders of this court.
"Thirdly, prima facie we are of the view that Thakur has made statements on affidavit before this court which are false to his knowledge...," the bench said.
On July 18, the court had accepted major recommendations of the Lodha Committee on reforms in BCCI, including a bar on ministers and civil servants and those above 70 from becoming its members, but left it to Parliament to decide whether it should come under RTI or whether betting on the game should be legalised.