"We do not find this report and its implications scientifically convincing," said a statement issued by four tiger biologists - Dr K Ullas Karanth from Wildlife Conservation Society India, Dale Miquelle, director of Russia Program of Wildlife Conservation Society, John Goodrich of Panthera US-based Panthera Corporation and Arjun Gopalaswamy from the University of Oxford.
Using flawed survey methodologies can lead to incorrect conclusions, an illusion of success, and slackening of conservation efforts, when in reality grave concern is called for, they said.
A recent report by WWF and the Global Tiger Forum (GTF) had said that the number of wild tigers has been revised to 3,890 compiled from IUCN data and the latest national tiger surveys.
The biologists said estimates of tiger numbers for
More From This Section
large landscapes, regions and countries currently in vogue in the global media for a number of countries are largely derived from weak methodologies.
Translating spoor counts to tiger numbers poses several statistical problems that remain unresolved, which can lead to fundamentally flawed claims of changes in tiger numbers, they said.
Taking these putative tiger numbers at face value, simple calculations show that doubling of the world's tigers in ten years as hoped for in the report is not a realistic proposition, they said.
As per Ministry of Environment and Forests, tiger population in India stood at 2,226 in 2014, with an increase of 30.5 per cent since the 2010 estimate.