The court acquitted the man, who is also facing trial in a separate case where a child died after the accused allegedly administered him an injection, saying there was lack of evidence against him owing to investigative lapses which have entirely dented the prosecution case.
"Quackery in the society is on a rise where unscrupulous people start practising Allopathy and Ayurvedic medicines which may at times take lives of the innocent persons. ... The toothless law would help and encourage these people more rather than to stop quackery," Metropolitan Magistrate Pankaj Sharma observed.
"The prosecution has to produce the evidence which is supportive of their case and which requires seizure of things, articles, medicines, prescription slips, records, video footage and other evidence related to, facts and circumstances which are totally ignored in this case," the court said.
It further said, "it is apparent that the accused served in Army Corps as medical assistant and did not have any requisite qualification to act like a doctor and administer medicines to patients but due to lack of any evidence against him owing to investigative lapses, it dented prosecution case in entirety."
More From This Section
According to the prosecution, on July 8, 2010, the DBCP, through its Anti-Quackery team held an inspection in Palam area in South West Delhi to check any unqualified person practising Indian system of Medicine.
The prosecution said theaccused, who claimed to be a
retiredNursing Assistant andBTA (BloodTransfusion Assistant) fromArmyMedicalCollege,failed to producehis registration certificate with Delhi Bhartiya Chikitsa Parishad andalso hismedical qualificationto practice medicine.
The court said, "Thesequacksposeagreatthreatto societyandif these unscrupulous peoplewouldbeallowedto gofreeduetotoothlessprosecution,it wouldbedetrimental tointerestofgeneralpublicandbeneficialtooffenders."
In his defence, the accused said he was innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case.