The ruling, in an administrative order from Alabama chief justice Roy Moore yesterday, came seven months after the US Supreme Court, in a historic 5-4 decision, held that states cannot prevent gay couples from marrying and that those that had refused to do so must now recognise such marriages.
Critics immediately dismissed Moore's contention that the high-court ruling was limited in scope. They said there was no question that the Supreme Court ruling extended nationwide.
He argued that a legal judgement "only binds the parties to the case before the court" and noted that the case considered by the Supreme Court, Obergefell v Hodges, was brought on behalf of same-sex couples only from Michigan, Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee.
Moore said that the result, in Alabama, was "confusion and uncertainty" regarding "the effect of Obergefell on the 'existing orders.'"
Also Read
Since the Supreme Court ruling, he said, some Alabama judges had issued licenses to same-sex couples, some only to opposite-sex couples and some not at all.
"No union is more profound than marriage," the ruling said. Of gay couples, Kennedy wrote that "their hope is not to be condemned to live in loneliness" and that "they ask for equal dignity in the eyes of the law."
He added, "The Constitution grants them that right."
Yesterday, critics sharply dismissed Moore's stance.
Scott McCoy, senior staff attorney for the Southern Poverty Law Centre, told the AL.Com website that Moore's order was a "dead letter," saying probate judges risked contempt if they failed to issue same-sex marriage licenses.
Judge Moore is an ultra-conservative Christian known for his acts of resistance to federal authority.
He was removed during an earlier stint as chief Alabama justice for refusing, in November 2003, to give in to a judicial order to remove a monument bearing the Ten Commandments from a spot before the state Supreme Court building.