The observation was made by a division bench on the eve of the sixth anniversary of the terror attacks, which claimed 164 lives and injured several people.
Justices V M Kanade and Anuja Prabhudesai lamented that though the Government was required to revise its policy on acquiring weapons every three years, this had not been done since 2010.
"Top police officers were killed during the 26/11 strikes as the weapons they used were not good," the judges remarked.
"It is most unfortunate that the 2010 policy has not been revised, in spite of various incidents of bomb blasts having taken place after the Mumbai terror attacks," said the bench, while hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Pune resident Ashwini Rane.
Also Read
The direction from the bench came after petitioner's counsel Anil Anturkar submitted that as per the policy, Rs 250 is given as dearness allowance per month to a policeman, which works out to about Rs 8 per day.
"With such a meagre amount, a policeman would not even be able to eat a wada-pav (a popular snack in Maharashtra)," Anturkar quipped.
Being in agreement with the argument advanced by the counsel, the judges remarked, "Generally, in several matters we pass strictures against policemen for not performing their duties, but if the State does not take care of them (police), then we cannot expect a better service from police...At least basic facilities should be provided."