Tread carefully while defining extremism: UK ministers told

Image
Press Trust of India London
Last Updated : Jul 22 2016 | 7:28 PM IST
A UK parliamentary committee today said there was currently no useable legal definition of 'extremism' and warned that ministers should "tread carefully" when they try to define extremism as it risked undermining relations with some communities.
The government should reconsider its strategy on fighting extremism because it risks making the situation worse, the Joint Committee on Human Rights said.
The committee, in a report, urged ministers to "tread carefully" when trying to define extremism as it risked undermining relations with some communities.
"It is far from clear that there is an accepted definition of what constitutes extremism, let alone what legal powers there should be, if any, to combat it. It does not appear that the government so far has been successful in arriving at one," the report said.
Currently the government defines extremism as "the vocal or active opposition to our fundamental values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and the mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs".
Committee chair Harriet Harman told BBC, "The difficulty with that is -- again it's the definition -- for example, I don't respect religions that regard women as subservient, I don't tolerate the views or beliefs of people who think that homosexuality is a sin, but I'm clearly not an extremist on the path to violence."
"To have draconian orders -- breach of which is a criminal offence -- without being able to describe the problem that you're trying to put these orders against, is a problem," he said.
The committee also urged a review of the government's current 'prevent counter-extremism strategy', which is designed to stop people from becoming radicalised.
It found that while there was agreement that tackling terrorism was a priority, but not on how to combat extremism.
"Extremism causes terrorism and broader social harms including hate crime, honour-based violence and discrimination. That is why we published a counter-extremism strategy which confronts all forms of extremist ideology head-on, supports mainstream voices, and builds stronger and more cohesive communities," a Home Office spokesperson said.
"This broad counter-extremism agenda is distinct and complementary to our prevent programme which safeguards those who may be vulnerable to being drawn into terrorism," the spokesperson said.
*Subscribe to Business Standard digital and get complimentary access to The New York Times

Smart Quarterly

₹900

3 Months

₹300/Month

SAVE 25%

Smart Essential

₹2,700

1 Year

₹225/Month

SAVE 46%
*Complimentary New York Times access for the 2nd year will be given after 12 months

Super Saver

₹3,900

2 Years

₹162/Month

Subscribe

Renews automatically, cancel anytime

Here’s what’s included in our digital subscription plans

Exclusive premium stories online

  • Over 30 premium stories daily, handpicked by our editors

Complimentary Access to The New York Times

  • News, Games, Cooking, Audio, Wirecutter & The Athletic

Business Standard Epaper

  • Digital replica of our daily newspaper — with options to read, save, and share

Curated Newsletters

  • Insights on markets, finance, politics, tech, and more delivered to your inbox

Market Analysis & Investment Insights

  • In-depth market analysis & insights with access to The Smart Investor

Archives

  • Repository of articles and publications dating back to 1997

Ad-free Reading

  • Uninterrupted reading experience with no advertisements

Seamless Access Across All Devices

  • Access Business Standard across devices — mobile, tablet, or PC, via web or app

More From This Section

First Published: Jul 22 2016 | 7:28 PM IST

Next Story