"Anything that looks scientific can make information you read a lot more convincing," said the study's lead author Aner Tal, from Cornell University's Food and Brand Lab.
"The scientific halo of graphs, formulas, and other trivial elements that look scientific may lead to misplaced belief," said Tal.
In one study, Tal and co-author Brian Wansink, recruited 61 individuals to read information about a new medication.
Half of the participants read a paragraph about the medication and the other half read the same paragraph with an accompanying graph.
Also Read
Two additional studies supported the researchers' hypotheses that individuals are influenced by "scientific looking" elements not because they help with understanding or information retention, but because "scientific looking" information is perceived as true.
In the second study 56 participants were presented with either the paragraph and graph from the first study or just with the paragraph with an added sentence repeating that the medication reduced illness by 20 per cent.
Retention of information was the same for both groups - graphs did not appear to increase their understanding of the information or their recall of the percentage by which it reduced illness.
Those who indicated a belief in science and who were shown the graph expressed the strongest confidence in the effectiveness of the medication.
This shows that belief in science can make individuals more likely to be persuaded by trivial, "scientific looking" graphs.
"A general faith in science may lead people to believe things that just look scientific, but aren't," said Tal.