The company backed by media mogul Barry Diller allowed people to watch and record broadcast TV online for USD 8 a month on tablets, phones and other gadgets.
Unlike Hulu and other online video services, Aereo offered live streaming of broadcast channels.
The Supreme Court ruled this summer that Aereo had been operating like a cable TV company, meaning that unless it paid broadcasters licensing fees, it was in violation of copyright law.
The company got its start in New York and had expanded to about 10 other metropolitan areas, including Boston, Houston and Atlanta, though it never disclosed how many subscribers it had.
Also Read
The Supreme Court decision "effectively changed the laws that had governed Aereo's technology, creating regulatory and legal uncertainty," CEO Chet Kanojia said.
The Chapter 11 filing will allow Aereo Inc. To maximise the value of its business while avoiding the cost and distraction of litigation, said Kanojia.
Aereo did not provide many details about what it would do with its technology but in a March interview with The Associated Press, Kanojia said the company's Internet-based recording technology was itself valuable.
Potential buyers of that technology could include cable-television operators that are trying to maintain subscriber levels by offering new ways to watch TV online.
Cable operators pay broadcasters millions of dollars in licensing fees, and would not be subject to the same legal challenges.