Started in January 2014 with 28 indicators, the system is now evaluating the performance of the districts on the basis of 34 health indicators since July 2016.
The indicators focus on family planning, maternal and child health, data quality of Health Management Information System (HMIS) and budget utilisation of National Rural Health Mission (NHM) funding.
"The district ranking aims at fostering the process of setting agendas for stimulating awareness to drive health outcomes, motivate district CMOs and DMs to prioritise over means to improved health outcomes and to help establish broad responsibilities and accountability of population health outcomes," a UP government official said.
Alok Kumar, Director, National Health Mission, said, "ranking is an effective tool to summarise complex information about a topic in a manner that is interpretable to everyone"
Also Read
The ranking of districts is broadly based on two indicators-input and output. Input indicators reflect the resources provided by the government like budget utilisation and construction while output indicators reflect the performance on the basis of service delivery like bed occupancy rate, percentages of institutional deliveries, beneficiaries of health schemes, fully immunised children, among others.
The districts in the lowest quintile get the score of '1' and those in the highest quintile get a score of '5' for each variable.
Three indicators -- missing deliveries, drop out of children in BCG and measles vaccination and maternal deaths -- are seen as negative indicators even if the district scores high on other indicators.
SK Jain, Chief Medical Officer of JP Nagar district which is one of the poor performing districts said, "we have acute shortage of specialist doctors in our hospitals. Even district hospital, we do not have adequate specialists. Still we are trying our level best to manage the things. Hopefully we will cover up in next few months".
Disclaimer: No Business Standard Journalist was involved in creation of this content