The US Trade Representative (USTR) Michael Froman said the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Appellate Body has issued a report finding in favour of the Obama Administration's challenge to India's "domestic content requirements" under its National Solar Mission.
Since India enacted these requirements in 2011, which requires solar power developers to use Indian-manufactured cells and modules, American solar exports to India have fallen by more than 90 per cent, he said.
The Appellate Body affirmed an earlier WTO panel report agreeing with the US that India's domestic content "requirements discriminated against" American-made and other imported solar products, in breach of international trade rules.
"This report is a clear victory for American solar manufacturers and workers, and another step forward in the fight against climate change," Froman said.
Also Read
The Obama administration, he said, strongly support rapid deployment of solar energy worldwide, including in India.
"But local content requirements are not only contrary to WTO rules, but actually undermine our efforts to promote clean energy by requiring the use of more expensive and less efficient equipment, making it more difficult for clean energy sources to be cost-competitive," Froman alleged.
The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) in a statement welcomed WTO's rejection of India's appeal and urged the Indian government to move quickly to dismantle its discriminatory domestic content requirements that have blocked access for US solar cell modules.
"This decision also demonstrates why the strong rules- based WTO system and trade agreements with binding and strong enforcement rules are critical to open markets and eliminate unfair barriers overseas," it said.
(Reopens FGN 33)
The WTO panel agreed that India's domestic content requirements discriminate against US solar cells and modules by requiring solar power developers to use Indian-manufactured cells and modules, in breach of international trade rules, it said.
In particular, the Appellate Body upheld the Panel's finding that India's DCR measures are not justified under the government procurement derogation of Article III:8(a) of the GATT 1994 because the Indian government does not itself procure solar cells or modules under the NSM, it said.
The Appellate Body upheld the Panel's finding that India's DCR measures could not be justified under Article XX(j) of the GATT 1994, because the Indian government had failed to establish that solar cells and modules were "in short supply" in India, it added.