"There are good reasons for the US government to avoid assertively internationalising other countries' self- determination conflicts, which can look like meddling in other countries' internal affairs," said Jason Sorens, from the Dartmouth College told members of House Foreign Affairs Committee during a hearing on US Policy Toward National Self-Determination Movements.
Sorens said the ongoing self-determination claims among others are found in Scotland, Catalonia, the Faroe Islands, Kashmir, Tamil Eelam, Somaliland, Western Sahara, West Papua, Tibet, and Mindanao.
Sorens said developing countries usually forbid self-determination movements from organising as political parties.
"For instance, Turkey, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, and Russia make advocacy for the self-determination of a particular region a criminal offence - an act that would be protected by the First Amendment in the United States," he said.
Also Read
Currently, there are over sixty national self- determination movements seeking independence or increased autonomy, said Dr Paul Williams Rebecca I Grazier, Professor of Law and International Relations American University President and Co-Founder, Public International Law and Policy Group.
"These conflicts afflict some of America's closest and most important allies such as the UK, France, Italy and Spain. They also afflict some of America's newest and most vulnerable allies such as Armenia, Georgia and Ukraine," Grazier said.