The remarks by John Carlin, the Obama administration's top national security attorney, came yesterday amid continuing skepticism about the effectiveness of the September agreement to curb cyber espionage and may signal a warning toward China despite what has been widely criticized as weak US responses to years of hacking blamed on China. The Chinese Embassy declined to comment.
The administration has described its new agreement with China as an historic and important step acknowledging hacking and labeling it as illegal theft.
"It was great we agreed to this norm, but that's all the more reason when we agreed to this norm, why, when people violate that and you catch them, there's a price to pay, be it criminal or through sanctions," said Carlin, speaking at a think-tank event.
But only weeks in, California-based company CrowdStrike Inc. Said it detected at least seven Chinese cyberattacks against US technology and pharmaceutical companies that appear clearly aimed at theft of intellectual property and trade secrets.
Also Read
Alperovitch urged organizations to remain vigilant until there was more information about how the administration intends to enforce the agreement.
The agreement does not prohibit cyber spying for national security purposes, which would ostensibly include the theft of personal information for 21 million Americans when the Office of Personnel Management was hacked in what the US believes was a Chinese espionage operation. The OPM hack was the most serious known cyber breach in US history.
Carlin said US trade sanctions imposed against North Korea over hacking Sony Pictures Entertainment Inc helped drive the China agreement.
"At the end of the day the status quo is unacceptable," Carlin said. "We need to keep increasing the costs until the costs outweigh the benefits and we see a change in behavior.