The Supreme Court today received a complaint from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) against Abercrombie & Fitch, popular among teenagers and known for sales associates often dressed in racy attire.
Samantha Elauf, then-aged 17, was refused a job at Abercrombie & Fitch in Tulsa, Oklahoma in 2008 because she wore a headscarf, violating the company's "look policy," which outlines how store associates should be groomed and dressed.
A federal judge initially found Abercrombie & Fitch liable for discrimination, a decision which was later appealed.
Under the Civil Rights Act, an employer cannot refuse to hire or dismiss workers based on religion, unless the employer is unable to accomodate the request "without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer's business."
Also Read
Elauf applied for a job at Abercrombie Kids, the retailer's children's line, and court documents said she did not ask about how the "look policy" could be adjusted to accommodate her religious dress at the time of the interview.
EEOC said its cases involving complaints of religious discrimination have more than doubled in the past 15 years, and said while most conflicts can be solved in the workplace, some, like Elauf's, spark a wider discussion.
"While work-religion conflicts are common, they can almost always be accommodated without undue hardship as long as both employees and employers have an adequate incentive to undertake the necessary dialogue," EEOC said in court documents.
Abercrombie & Fitch stores typically feature sculpted and slender mannequins wooing clients at the store entrance, often modelling low-slung jeans, plunging necklines, crop tops or short skirts.