Giving a direction to this effect, Justice N Kirubakaran said it became difficult to prove if relatives or friends were informed if the same was done over phone.
The judge agreed with counsel for the applicant R Gandhi that since the telegraph service had been discontinued, the best option available to police was to use e-post service offered by the Department of Posts.
He expressed displeasure over police using the phone to intimate the family of those arrested in criminal cases, despite a ban on the practice by a division bench in the Principal Seat of the High Court on August 29 2013.
Police officers should have prepared an arrest memo with the date and time of arrest and get it attested by at least one witness, either a family member of the arrested person or a respectable person of the locality where the arrest is made.
The judge noted that the SI had just mentioned a phone number in the arrest memo and recorded that his wife had been informed of the arrest on that number.