"During the pendency of the appeals against the Bombay High court orders, the Hon'ble Supreme Court constituted an independent probe panel under Justice Mukul Mudgal and directed N.Srinivasan to step aside as president of BCCI by order dated 28-03-2014. Despite this order the BCCI nominated N Srinivasan to the post of chairman ICC since it was the turn of BCCI to have its nominee. The BCCI did not care about institutional integrity and had no hesitation in nominating a person who was asked by the Supreme Court to step down as BCCI president," Verma, the petitioner in the IPL spot-fixing case, wrote in his letter.
The letter further said that in the BCCI AGM on March 2, even before the election of the office bearers, the meeting endorsed the nomination of Srinivasan as BCCIs nominee for the post of ICC chairman.
"Srinivasan was present when all the agenda items including endorsement of his nomination as chairman of ICC were being discussed. The endorsement of Srinivasan as ICC chairman in the AGM is totally unacceptable. When the Hon'ble Supreme Court found that Srinivasan is incompetent to contest the election for any post it is highly objectionable that the AGM chose to endorse N.Srinivasan's nomination," the letter said.