"BCCI, even though has been held to be amenable to writ jurisdiction, is functioning more like a private club of few individuals having vested interest," Verma wrote in the letter.
The BCCI had last Thursday sought the opinion of the Supreme Court on whether Srinivasan could attend the meetings of the board as the authorised representative of Tamil Nadu Cricket Association (TNCA).
"... Since Mr Srinivasan was insisting on attending the working committee, the working committee had to be adjourned sine die and several lakhs spent for the meeting were wasted. Consequently the date for the AGM was also not fixed. Hence, the AGM was also not held as usual in the month of September, 2015," Verma wrote in the letter.
"Except to leak information to the press that BCCI is moving the Supreme Court for clarification on the question whether Mr Srinivasan can attend the Working Committee, no concrete steps have been taken by BCCI to seek clarification from the Supreme Court. It is also a moot point whether the Supreme Court will entertain such an application from BCCI which is unable to deal with Mr Srinivasan.