Advocate Rizwan Merchant, Paraskar's lawyer, argued before special judge Vrushali Joshi that the first alleged incident of molestation had happened on December 1 last year and on December 7 she was allegedly raped but she did not go to the police then, though there was an opportunity.
"The victim claims she was molested on December 1 and then she was raped after a week. Even after the incident of rape, she went back with Paraskar. Is it not a consensual act?" he said.
Further, he argued that on December 7, the victim had met Paraskar at a mall from where they went to suburban Malad. "A week ago she was molested and still she goes to the mall to meet Paraskar," Merchant pointed out.
While going to Madh island off suburban Malad, she did not ask him where they were heading, the lawyer noted. "At Madh, the girl went into a bungalow with the man who had molested her a week ago."
"She has also said that she saw a bottle of liquor and Paraskar offered her but she refused and later he had it; wasn't it enough to get an idea what was going to happen?"
After the alleged rape, both came out of the bungalow together and travelled together. "This cannot be termed as rape, is it not consensual?" Merchant contended.