"The ED application is allowed and proclamation is issued against Vijay Mallya," ordered Special Judge PR Bhavke.
The agency had moved the court to issue an order under Section 82 CrPC and term the liquor baron a proclaimed offender as he has "multiple" arrest warrants pending against him including a non-bailable warrant (NBW) under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
The agency has told the court about the status of investigations in the case and the need to get Mallya join the probe.
A person can be termed a proclaimed offender in a criminal case probe if the court has reasons to believe that the accused against whom a warrant of arrest has been issued by it, has absconded or is concealing himself so that such warrant cannot be executed.
More From This Section
Officials said that the agency also has the option to seek action under Section 83 of the CrPC (attachment of property of person absconding) if Mallya does not comply with proceedings initiated under Section 82.
ED has been wanting Mallya to join investigations "in person" in its PMLA probe against him and others in the Rs 900 crore alleged loan fraud of IDBI bank and has virtually exhausted all legal remedies like seeking an Interpol arrest warrant and getting his passport revoked.
Mallya had left India on March 2 using his diplomatic passport.
The agency has registered a money laundering case against Mallya and others based on an FIR registered last year by the CBI.
ED is also investigating financial structure of Kingfisher Airlines and looking into any payment of kickbacks to secure loans.
On Saturday, the ED had attached assets worth Rs 1,411 crore of Mallya and one of his companies in connection with its money laundering probe in the bank loan case.
ED's lawyer Hiten Venegoankar said the officials tried to execute the non-bailable warrant issued against Mallya on April 18, but he was not available at his known addresses.
Issuance of Red Corner Notice against the liquor baron was in the process, and Mallya's absence had stalled the investigation, the lawyer said.
"As per statements of Mallya's CFO, he (Mallya) is not in India. But Mallya is giving statements to the media," said Venegoankar.
The lawyer further alleged that Mallya had started to dispose of some of his properties. "If a proclamation is issued then we will go ahead with attaching the properties which are not proceeds of crime in this case," he said.
The ED, in its application, said it had issued three summons through the company representatives and via email.
"Mallya kept evading his attendance on one ground or other and has failed to appear in person so far. This act of non-appearance on the part of Mallya was hindrance in the investigation to find out the truth.
"His absence is unnecessarily delaying the proceeding and there is a reasonable apprehension that he may be tampering with the crucial evidence in and outside India," the ED said, adding that his custodial interrogation is utmost necessary to ascertain the trail of the proceeds of the crime.
"In spite of issuance of three summons, revocation of passport and also after issuance of NBW he has remained elusive and has failed to present himself in person before the court," said the application.