"Was it simply for fun that you had moved that application for summoning the former Prime Minister?" Special CBI Judge Bharat Parashar asked Koda's counsel when he was arguing on framing of charges in the case.
The court asked this after Koda's counsel Anshuman Sinha argued that there was no conspiracy as alleged by CBI in its charge sheet in the case.
Responding to the court's query, Koda's counsel said that while arguing on the plea to summon Singh as an accused, he had only said that as per CBI's case there was a conspiracy.
"I have only said that if at all there was any conspiracy then he (Singh) should be called as well. CBI cannot have different yardsticks," he told the court.
Also Read
During the arguments today, Koda's counsel said there was no evidence suggesting any conspiracy as far as his client was concerned.
"I have to have the knowledge first which could bring me under the ambit of conspiracy. There is no knowledge on my part.... There is nothing to show that Koda had any knowledge of the alleged illegal act and there was no intention to act in its furtherance as well," he said.
During the arguments, Gupta's counsel told the court that
being a public servant then, he was duty bound to follow and implement the government's policy which he did.
"Ministry of Coal was then headed by then Prime Minister. I was only following the guidelines of government of India," he said.
The arguments on framing of charges in the case would continue tomorrow.
CBI had earlier told the court that Jindal, Rao, Koda and Gupta had conspired with others to get the coal block allocated in favour of the two Jindal group firms.
Besides the ten accused, five firms -- JSPL, Jindal Realty Pvt Ltd, Gagan Infraenergy Ltd (formerly known as GSIPL), Sowbhagya Media Ltd and New Delhi Exim Pvt Ltd -- are also accused in the case.