Cairn India told a bench of justices Badar Durrez Ahmed and Sanjeev Sachdeva, that of the principal tax demand of Rs 10,248 crore, Rs 4,200 crore was already secured and it would inform about the rest and what kind of security or guarantee it can give on the next date of hearing.
Cairn, represented by senior advocate Harish Salve, has sought quashing of the IT department's demand order saying the proceedings were initiated after a lapse of more than six years from the end of the relevant financial year of 2006-07.
It said the courts have held that such proceedings should be initiated within a reasonable period of four years.
It also said it had in 2006 carried out an internal group reorganisation through 100 per cent share swaps, to facilitate initial public offer of CIL, and in such a process there would be no capital gains.
Also Read
Cairn agreed with the court's view, but said in the instant case, the exercise was not carried out.
Attorney General (AG) Mukul Rohatgi opposed Cairn's submissions saying issue of computation of tax as well as delay cannot be debated before the High Court.
The court said it was only saying the correct principle should be applied while computing tax and listed the matter for further hearing on April 22.