The government, in its affidavit, said the standing committee would meet on January 25 and consider all aspects suggested by the petitioners, and if practical, take decisions so that follow-up action could be taken by all states.
The petitioners had earlier given suggestions, including a mechanism to curb human-animal conflict, measures to reduce animal deaths on roads, highways and by electrocution and plan to protect critically endangered Great Indian Bustard.
In its affidavit, the Centre has said that considering the "magnitude" of the entire exercise, follow-up action would take at least four months, after which they would place a report before the top court.
"It is submitted that the standing committee of the wildlife board is meeting on January 25, 2018 and all the five suggestions of the petitioner can be placed before the standing committee," the affidavit said.
More From This Section
Regarding the suggestions pertaining to human-animal conflict and recovery plans for critically endangered Great Indian Bustard
, the government said an in-depth study has been prepared by the Ministry of Environment and Forest and Climate Change for the period 2017-2031.
"This elaborate report which is titled 'The National Wildlife Action Plan (2017-2031)' has been placed before Parliament in December 2017," it said, adding that the Centre has also issued various advisories in regard to human-wildlife conflict.
Additionally, a draft guidance document titled 'eco- friendly measures to mitigate impacts of linear infrastructure on wildlife' has been prepared on which comments were invited, it said.
It also placed before the court an elaborate document, which has been prepared in consultation with the National Highways Authority of India, in this regard.
The apex court, after a brief hearing, posted the matter for hearing in first week of April.
It had also sought the Centre's response on the PIL seeking measures, including framing of a national policy, to save endangered species like the Great Indian Bustard and snow leopard.
The petitioners had told the top court that species like Great Indian Bustards, snow leopards and wolves were on the verge of extinction and they needed to be conserved.
They had also referred to unnatural deaths of elephants on highways and railway tracks and said that areas earmarked for the largest mammal were not sufficient.