"Looking into the seriousness and gravity of the allegations levelled by the complainant (wife) against the petitioner (husband) and also considering the fact that the complainant in fact had never resided with the husband to lead matrimonial life with him, this court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner," Justice Kailash Gambhir said.
Taking note of the wife's allegations, the court, in its order, said, "It is also the case of the complainant that the petitioner had raped her on many occasions against her wishes after emotionally blackmailing her and now he has sent a 'talaknama' to her."
She had further alleged that due to her husband's conduct, within six months of the marriage the differences arose between them.
"He had forced her on so many occasions on the pretext that now she is his legally wedded wife and, therefore, it is his right to have sex with her. He was also blackmailing her and even extracted Rs 2.5 lakh from her," as per her complaint.