The ruling was delivered by justices V N Kanade and G S Kulkarni who quashed and set aside a judgement of Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) allowing reinstatement of A V Tungare, an employee of Employees State Insurance Corporation (ESIC), with 50 per cent back wages.
"In the present case, the disciplinary authority on the basis of the inquiry report which recorded the admission of the first respondent (employee) held that the charges have been proved," noted the judges.
In this background, there is merit in the submissions advanced by the ESIC that the CAT could not have set aside the order of dismissal as passed by the disciplinary authority, the bench observed in its judgement.
"We are of the view that the Central Administrative Tribunal is in a clear error in directing reinstatement of the 1st respondent with 50 per cent back wages and permitting the disciplinary inquiry on reinstatement by allowing the original application filed by the 1st respondent," it noted.
ESIC had filed a petition challenging the CAT order. It was admitted by the high court on September 13, 2002 and by an interim order, the implementation of the CAT judgement was stayed. During the pendency of the petition, Tungare, who had joined ESIC in 1978, had attained the age of superannuation in 2011.